Cases 21 - 30 of 312
Dickens v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00862
Petitioner:
Christopher Dickens
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Waters v. S. Brown
as 23-6191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY A. WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MRS. S. BROWN, Warden, J. MCCALLOUM, Correctional Officer, S. SENKO, Correctional Officer/Paramedic and others
Wiles v. Hubbard et al
as 8:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Wiles
Defendant:
Aaron Weston Hubbard, Darrel D. Dirks, Christine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Muhammad
Defendant:
S Brown, Detective Kelly, CORRECTION OFFICER Roget and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Karlton Ray Cherry
Defendant:
S. Brown and S. Senko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cherry v. Brown et al
as 5:2030cv00031
Plaintiff:
Karlton Ray Cherry
Defendant:
S. Brown and S. Senko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waters v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Waters
Defendant:
Mrs. S. Brown, J. McCalloum, S. Senko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. State Of Georgia et al
as 2:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Brown
Defendant:
State Of Georgia, William Danforth and Kourtney Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benbow v. Richmond City Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Benbow
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail, Lt. J. Brown and Deputy S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
