Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 24-6362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., VANMETER, Nurse and others
Charles Head v. Asst. Warden Sample
as 21-7434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSISTANT WARDEN SAMPLE, WARDEN J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH, Sis Officer and others
HEAD v. SAMPLE et al
as 1:2021cv02550
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant:
SAMPLE, J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Head v. All Mailroom Officers of FCI Cumberland Prison et al
as 1:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
Charles Head
Defendant:
S. Eirich, Warden J.R. Bell, All Mailroom Officers of FCI Cumberland Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Michael Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 20-6764
Defendant / Appellee:
MOHAMED MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 19-7767
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE VANMETER, MOHAMED MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, PA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Revera
as 19-7457
Defendant / Appellee:
D. DEURR, S. EIRICH and MS. REVERA, Assistant Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Ms. Revera et al
as 1:2019cv02466
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owefeather-Gorbey
Defendant:
D. Deurr, Ms. Revera and S. Eirich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eunice Husband v. Harrell Watt
as 11-6771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUNICE HUSBAND
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals; individual capacity, K. M. WHITE, Regional Director, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office; individual capacity, JOE D. DRIVER, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Hazelton; individual capacity and others
Husband v. Watts et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, K. M. White, Joe D. Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
