Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Gabriel et al v. Foster et al
as 2:2012cv02776
Plaintiff:
Edmund Gabriel and Nicole Harris
Defendant:
John S Foster, Joseph Eletto Transfer, Inc., Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gonzales v. Francisco et al
as 1:2012cv01786
Plaintiff:
Jimmy O. Gonzales
Defendant:
T. Francisco, C. Riley, P. Curliss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 1:2012cv02689
Plaintiff:
Jermaine S Foster
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Hutson v. S. Foster et al
as 3:2012cv00527
Defendant:
T. Carlman, S. Foster and Panazzo
Plaintiff:
Robert Hutson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Escobar v. Foster, et al
as 12-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR
Defendant - Appellee:
S. FOSTER, L. REID, L. MAIFIELD and others
Baber et al v. County of Frederick, Virginia et al
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Scott Baber, Kim C. Bohrer, Jeffrey S. Bowerman and others
Defendant:
County of Frederick, Virginia, Frederick County Sheriff's Office, John R. Riley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sledge v. Lundy et al
as 2:2012cv00914
Plaintiff:
Tony Sledge
Defendant:
J Lundy, E. Prince, M. Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sledge v. Lundy et al
as 1:2012cv00588
Plaintiff:
Tony Sledge
Defendant:
J Lundy, E. Prince, M. Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moskios et al v. Foster
as 1:2012cv00591
Plaintiff:
Jodie Cowan and Phillip S. Moskios, Sr.
Defendant:
Gregory S. Foster
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
