Cases 41 - 50 of 532
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10984
Plaintiff:
William Scott Harris and WILLIAM S HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Foye v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03205
Plaintiff:
Delgen Foye
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Clayton R. Higgins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Hunt et al
as 1:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Isaiah S. Harris, Sr., Isaiah S. Harris, Jr., Iyana S. Harris and others
Defendant:
Deborah S. Hunt, Clarence Maddox, Susan Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Harris et al
as 6:2022cv01188
Petitioner:
Harrell A. Gastong, VI and Anthony Gastong Harrell
Respondent:
S. Harris, Carolyn Caitlin, Hillsborough County Inc., Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darcy v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03196
Plaintiff:
Alan Peter Darcy
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gaither Harris v. Acts Syrene Apartments
as 22-15680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAITHER S. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTS SYRENE APARTMENTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Harris v. State of Florida
as 8:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Harris
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
