Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Deshawn Chappell v.N. McDowell et al
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Juarez v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
Carlos Juarez
Defendant:
J. Lynch, Connie Gibson, S. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Calderon v. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 22-55449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID CALDERON
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SIMONSON, Officer, individual and official capacity, L. GUERRA, Officer, individual and official capacity and others
(PC)Calloway v. Youssee et al
as 1:2021cv01450
Plaintiff:
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway
Defendant:
A. Youssee, S. Davenport, S. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Quezada v. Nepomuceno et al
as 1:2020cv01351
Defendant:
M. Felder, C. Nepomuceno, S. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborn #178862 v. Wishchuen et al
as 2:2020cv01155
Defendant:
Y Simpson, Pamela Olmstead, Unknown Wishchuen and others
Plaintiff:
David Randall Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brayan Martin Meza v. Dean Borders et al
as 2:2019cv10297
Defendant:
Dean Borders and S. Lopez Briseno
Plaintiff:
Brayan Martin Meza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hill v. Pfeifer et al
as 2:2019cv01724
Plaintiff:
Taft L Hill
Defendant:
S Lopez, C. Pfeifer, K Cater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
