Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Jeffry W. Parker, Rosemary V. Bourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Lynn
as 5:2021hc02059
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lynn
Petitioner:
Roymad Shaquil McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00223
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lynn v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08272
Plaintiff:
Jeff S. Lynn
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2018cv00944
Plaintiff:
Allen S. Lynn, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Broadhead v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
M. Strickland, R. Butler, M. Laman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiq, S. Howard, LPN Roders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Fitzpatrick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00484
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
T. Fitzpatrick, S. Halliam, M. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Holcey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Michael Holcey, M. Foster, P. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Roders et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
E. Roders, Officer Holincey, Earnestine Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
