Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ritter v. Shelby County, Texas et al
as 9:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ritter
Defendant:
Shelby County, Texas, Hon. Karren S. Price and Hon. Johnie L. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05222
Plaintiff:
Shawn S Price
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaisson v. Price et al
as 4:2020cv00768
Defendant:
Gary L. Price and Peggy S. Price
Plaintiff:
Jana Chaisson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
William Stamps, Jr. v. Fredrick Menifee, et al
as 15-30664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAMPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDRICK MENIFEE, JOE KEFFER, W. A. SHERROD and others
Stamps v. Menifee et al
as 1:2015cv00218
Plaintiff:
William Stamps, Jr
Defendant:
Fredrick Menifee, Joe Keffer, W A Sherrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chadwick Price v. Louisiana Supreme Court, et al
as 12-30188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHADWICK S. PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA and COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Price et al v. Louisiana Supreme Court et al
as 2:2011cv01663
Plaintiff:
Chadwick S. Price
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Louisiana and Committee on Bar Admissions of the Supreme Court of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 5:2011cv00454
Plaintiff:
William S. Price, Jr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Corporate Benefits
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jeffery v. Wallace et al
as 1:2011cv00199
Petitioner:
Horace Jeffery
Respondent:
D B Wallace and S Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Jane Cockrell and S Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
