Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Allison-Ramsey Architects, Inc v. Schumacher Homes of S.C., et al
as 2:2016cv10974
Plaintiff:
Allison-Ramsey Architects, Inc
Defendant:
Schumacher Homes of S.C., et al
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Julian Rochester v. Federal Prison Director, et al
as 15-5670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL PRISON DIRECTOR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILLIAM N. NETTLES, S.C. U.S. Attorney and others
Robert Stooksbury, Jr. v. Michael Ro
as 15-5588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.
Interested Party - Appellee:
STERLING OWEN, IV
Defendant:
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al, dba Rarity Pointe Realty, dba Rarity Reality
Interested Party - Appellant:
TED DOUKAS
Intervenor - Appellant:
ATHENA OF S.C. LLC
Rochester v. Stevenson et al
as 3:2015cv00372
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R. Stevenson, B. Stirling, State S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Brooks et al
as 1:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hurlbut
Defendant:
S.C. Brooks, D.W. Whitney, Mike Ruedisueli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stamper v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00042
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. and St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angela Parks Stamper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00405
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Robert Stooksbury, Jr. v. Michael Ross, et al
as 12-6230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al, dba Rarity Pointe Realty, dba Rarity Reality
Defendant - Appellant:
ATHENA OF S.C. LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
