Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Zip Top, Inc. v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05028
Plaintiff:
Zip Top, Inc.
Defendant:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Shower B Clean, LLC v. S.C. Johnson and Sons, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Shower B Clean, LLC
Defendant:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Prestone Products Corporation v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01853
Plaintiff:
Prestone Products Corporation
Defendant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , South/Win, Ltd. and S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Yarbough v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Yarbough
Defendant:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
RICHES v. S.C. JOHNSON & SON INC.
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
S.C. JOHNSON & SON INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
RICHES v. S.C. JOHNSON & SON INC.
as 1:2009cv00458
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
S.C. JOHNSON & SON INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. et al v. The Dial Corporation
as 3:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and Consultoria Tecnica E Representacoes, LDA
Defendant:
The Dial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dial Corporation v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01131
Plaintiff:
Dial Corporation
Defendant:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. et al v. The Dial Corporation
as 3:2007cv00689
Plaintiff:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and Consultoria Tecnica E Representacoes, LDA
Defendant:
The Dial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
