Cases 1 - 10 of 69
BANU et al v. FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2026cv02359
Plaintiff:
SHAKILA BANU, SALIMA MOSTAFA and SHAHNAJ BEGUN
Defendant:
FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv08263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv08252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv08253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)(2) - (r)(l) -- Job Discrimination (Religion)
McCree v. City of New York
as 25-1009
Plaintiff:
SALIMA MCCREE, individually and as the Administratrix of the Estate of Matthew McCree and MATTHEW MCCREE
Defendant:
HEATHER LEYKAM, MELINDA ALGARIN, ELIZABETH SANNA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07615
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vishnani v. City of Independence, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Shiraj Vishnani and Salima Vishani
Defendant:
City of Independence, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
