Cases
KLM Marketing, LLC v. Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc. d/b/a Hanwha Techwin America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv09952
Plaintiff: KLM Marketing, LLC
Defendant: Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc. d/b/a Hanwha Techwin America and Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc doing business as Hanwha Techwin America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds Diversity-Contract Dispute
Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00371
Plaintiff: Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd.
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. , Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Amethyst IP, LLC v. Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc.
as 2:2013cv04674
Plaintiff: Amethyst IP, LLC
Defendant: Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Canatelo, LLC v. Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2013cv01099
Plaintiff: Canatelo, LLC
Defendant: Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. and Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Richard C Palmer Jr v. Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc et al
as 2:2012cv07318
Defendant: Does and Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc
Plaintiff: Richard C Palmer, Jr
Type: Labor Labor: Other
OBJECTVIDEO, INC. v. SAMSUNG TECHWIN COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 1:2012mc00295
Petitioner: OBJECTVIDEO, INC.
Respondent: SAMSUNG TECHWIN COMPANY, LTD. and SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
ObjectVideo, Inc. v. Gmbh et al
as 3:2011cv00217
Plaintiff: ObjectVideo, Inc.
Defendant: Robert Bosch Gmbh, Bosch Security Systems, Inc., Samsung Group and others
Counter_claimant: Sony Electronics, Inc.
Counter_defendant: ObjectVideo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281
PAPST LICENSING GmbH & CO KG v. SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO et al
as 2:2007cv04940
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GmbH & CO. KG
Defendant: SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO and SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Samsung Techwin Co et al
as 2:2007cv04249
Plaintiff: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG and others
Defendant: Samsung Techwin Co and Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?