Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Arnesen v. Raimondo
as 24-60055
Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc., William Copeland and others
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, NMFS Assistant Administrator and others
Amicus Curiae: Cato Institute
NEW ENGLAND FISHERMEN'S STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION v. RAIMONDO et al
as 2:2023cv00339
Plaintiff: NEW ENGLAND FISHERMEN'S STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION and JERRY LEEMAN
Defendant: GINA RAIMONDO, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, JANET COIT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arnesen et al v. Raimondo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff: George D. Arnesen and Jeffrey Ryan Bradley
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. and William Copeland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Association of Village Council Presidents et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff: Association of Village Council Presidents and Tanana Chiefs Conference
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Department of Commerce, Gina M. Raimondo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana State v. NOAA
as 22-30799
Plaintiff / Appellant: Louisiana State, by and through Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
Defendant / Appellee: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Richard Spinrad, Administrator, Chris Oliver, In His Official Capacity as Assistant Administrator For Fisheries, Samuel D. Rauch, III, In His Official Capacity as Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs and others
Louisiana State v. Department of Commerce et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01523
Petitioner: State of Louisiana
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, Richard Spinrad, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration and others
Plaintiff: Louisiana State
Amicus Curiae: Center for Biological Diversity, Turtle Island Restoration Network and Defenders of Wildlife
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Territory of American Samoa v. NMFS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17081
Plaintiff - Appellee: TERRITORY OF AMERICAN SAMOA
Defendant - Appellant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Alfa International Seafood, I, et al v. Wilbur Ross, et al
as 17-5138
Plaintiff - Appellee: Alfa International Seafood, Inc., Fortune Fish & Gourmet, Handy Seafood Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce, Benjamin Friedman, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans & Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator, Samuel D. Rauch, III, Acting Assistant Administrator for NOAA Fisheries and Head of National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers
Movant - Appellant: Oceana, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council and Center for Biological Diversity
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. et al v. TRUMP et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00253
Plaintiff: PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. , NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARK SANDY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Alaska Oil and Gas Association, et al v. Penny Pritzker, et al
as 14-35811
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant: PENNY PRITZKER, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?