Cases 81 - 90 of 164
Ronnie Davis v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 15-30486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE KEITH DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, LYNN COOPER, BLANE LACHNEY and others
Johnson v. Sheriff Rick Beseler et al
as 3:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Rick Beseler and Steven Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. The Sonoma County Main Adult Dentention Facility et al
as 4:2014cv05397
Plaintiff:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
The Sonoma County Main Adult Dentention Facility, Walker, Fadoki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2014cv03304
Plaintiff:
Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
City of Springfield , J Coker and A Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce Merrick, et al v. Diageo Americas Supply, Inc.
as 14-6198
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRUCE MERRICK, ARTHUR MILBY, ROSE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DIAGEO AMERICAS SUPPLY, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Paul Johnson v. Steve Freita
as 14-16552
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL SAMUEL JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE FREITAS, Sonoma County Sheriff
Johnson v. Chapell et al
as 4:2014cv01300
Plaintiff:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Chapell, CDC Staff, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv00369
Plaintiff:
COREY M. OWENS
Defendant:
TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and SAMUEL JOHNSON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv03574
Petitioner:
SAMUEL JOHNSON
Respondent:
KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
