Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Patterson v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 3:2017cv05450
Plaintiff:
Samuel Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank , Rosy Davalos , Meguel Bustos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Goettl, Victor et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as WIW/3:16-cv-00501
Plaintiff:
Victor Goettl , Darden Bridgeforth & Sons , Bridgeforth Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG , Crop Protection AG , Syngenta Corp. and others
Goettl, Victor et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Victor Goettl , Darden Bridgeforth & Sons , Bridgeforth Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
United States of America v. Ten Thousand Two Hundred Eighty and 00/100 Dollars ($10,280.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ten Thousand Two Hundred Eighty and 00/100 Dollars ($10,280.00) in United States Currency and Twenty-Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($25,000.00) in United States Currency
Movant:
Samuel Patterson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
PATTERSON et al
as 3:2012cv02861
Plaintiff:
TYRELL PATTERSON , SHANTILEY PATTERSON , MARGOT PATTERSON and others
Defendant:
RURAL PROJECTS, LLC., LAUTENBERG FOR SENATE, INC., RUSH HOLT FOR CONGRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Patterson v. Holder
as 11-2222
Petitioner:
Cassell Samuel Patterson, AKA Carlton Reed, AKA Cassen Patterson, AKA Cassell Rasta, AKA Samey Patterson
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Patterson v. US Bank
as 3:2010cv04256
Plaintiff:
Samuel Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
US Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Wallace et al
as 1:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Davis
Defendant:
Wanda Wallace, Wanda Wallace, Wanda Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
