Cases 1 - 10 of 2,731
Perry v. Briseno, et al
as 1:2025cv00044
Defendant:
Unknown Harrison, Katherine Arnold, Unknown Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Phillip Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv00137
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Derrick Jackson v. Baldwin County Sheriff, et al
as 25-10040
Defendant:
BRAD KIN, SANFORD and BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BERNARD JACKSON
Pattison v. NDOC/AGO RICO Enterprise et al
as 3:2025cv00002
Defendant:
NDOC/AGO RICO Enterprise, Sandra Walker, C. Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mayo Clinic et al v. Sanford Health Plan
as 0:2024cv04474
Plaintiff:
Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Hospital-Rochester
Defendant:
Sanford Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
MCCARTHY v. YARBER et al
as 1:2024cv02164
Defendant:
SANFORD, JOSEPH, ORLEY YARBER and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. MASSEE et al
as 5:2024cv00452
Defendant:
BRAD KIN, JUDGE SANFORD and BILL MASSEE
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BERNARD JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yang v. Roper et al
as 3:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Siyu Yang
Defendant:
Jonathan Sanford, Matthias Vorwerk, Gregory Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Romo v. City of Portales et al
as 2:2024cv01216
Defendant:
Nicholas Jackson, Haley Levy, Jesus Gabriza and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Romo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
