Cases 1 - 10 of 1,072
United States of America v. One Taurus International TX22 pistol bearing serial number 1PT480047 et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Taurus International TX22 pistol bearing serial number 1PT480047, One Ruger Security-380 pistol bearing serial number 386-29513, One Taurus GX4 pistol bearing serial number 1GA32533 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924 Civil Forfeiture of Firearms
USA v. Sig Sauer Sig M400 Rifle
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Sig Sauer Sig M400 Rifle
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Keith Slatowski, et al v. Sig Sauer Inc
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
KEITH SLATOWSKI and BIANCA CEMINI SLATOWSKI
Defendant:
SIG SAUER INC
Boshers v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Kyle Boshers
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UNITED STRUCTURES OF GEORGIA LLC v. SAUER INC et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
United Structures of Georgia, LLC
Defendant:
Sauer, Inc. and FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Timothy Davis v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 24-5210
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EUGENE ELVIS DAVIS
Defendant:
SIG SAUER, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sauer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Sauer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
