Cases 21 - 30 of 1,639
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, MJ MCFADDEN, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, BRYCE TURGENSON, SCOTT LEE ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudurkaewa et al v. MidFirst Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10186
Plaintiff:
Petimat Dudurkaewa, Chris Rubenstein, Scott Linman and others
Defendant:
Midfirst Bank and Midland Financial Co
Interested Party:
Darryl Strucke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Linman et al v. Midland Financial Co
as 1:2024cv10188
Plaintiff:
Scott Linman
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Greco v. Quetglas-Jordan et al
as 3:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
W. Scott Greco
Defendant:
Eric Quetglas-Jordan and Quetglas Law Offices
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scott v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10166
Plaintiff:
Mary Scott
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cameron Scott LLC, et al v. Dillon
as 1:2024cv10132
Plaintiff:
Cameron Scott LLC and F/V Cameron Scott
Defendant:
James Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Next Insurance US Company v. Courtemarche et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Next Insurance US Company
Defendant:
Scott Courtemarche, Scoco Family Home Builders, LLC, Scott Halcarz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
