Cases 41 - 50 of 2,496
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy Smith, Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Lusk, et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Defendant:
Anthony Scott White, Michael Lusk, Bart Craytor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Newton County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Azayvian Russell
Defendant:
Newton County Sheriff Department, Scott County Sheriff Department and Newton City Police Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Name Unknown #1 et al
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Scott Graves
Defendant:
Name Unknown #1 and Name Unknown #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Wilson v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
