Cases 21 - 30 of 1,051
Scott v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Masiker v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Masiker
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, White County Detention Center and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Keesee v. Eddleman
as 4:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Zachery Scott Keesee
Defendant:
Travis L Eddleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Runion et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
Zachary Scott Davis
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Sergeant McGrew, Corporal Blackwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkins v. Staten et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M Staten, Scott Taylor, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staats v. Tullis et al
as 5:2023cv05195
Plaintiff:
Robert Staats
Defendant:
Sherri Tullis, Julie Haskin, Corporal Drew Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Scott v. Karas et al
as 5:2023cv05188
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Karas, Earl Hinely and Tim Helder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Lattimore, Mussadic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
