Cases 1 - 10 of 2,412
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Jackson v. Scott County et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Scott County, Tim Lane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Paul Scott Harvey
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Musaddiq and Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell Larson v. Buchanan County Jail, et al
as 24-1485
Plaintiff:
Russell A. Larson
Defendant:
Buchanan County Jail, Scott Buzynski, Mike Rothford and others
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Summers et al
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Summers, Smith, DeCastro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Cooksie et al
as 4:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Lanika Cooksie, Shelby Huston, John Brazzeale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
