Cases 1 - 10 of 77
United States v. Brandon Holmes
as 23-1560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Brandon Scott Holmes
Brandon Resch v. Arthur Campfield, et al
as 23-1152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARCUS RESCH
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTHUR DUDLEY CAMPFIELD, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, JEREMY BUSH and others
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
United States v. Bryan Holm
as 22-2594
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Bryan Scott Holm, also known as Bryan Holm
Miller #418575 v. Edger et al
as 1:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Elite Miller #418575
Defendant:
Andrea Lindhout Edger and Scott Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain #694450 v. Holmes et al
as 1:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
David McClain #694450
Defendant:
Scott Holmes, Jeanne Bean, Luba Nagorny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #343032 v. Mikel et al
as 1:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
Apollo Johnson #343032
Defendant:
Nathan Mikel, Unknown Steffke, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marohn v. Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design et al
as 0:2021cv01241
Defendant:
Erica Larson, Tari Rayala, Meg Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Marohn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Resch #304507 v. Campfield et al
as 1:2021cv00293
Defendant:
Unknown Freed, Unknown Leik, Unknown Stavida and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marcus Resch #304507
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97645
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
