Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Briggs v. Gregg County Jail et al
as 6:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Casey Lee Briggs
Defendant:
Gregg County Jail, Sgt. Unknown Stadt and Lt. Scott Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07641
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Ted W. Love, Mark L. Perry and others
Kent v. Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Ted W. Love, Mark L. Perry and others
MORRISON v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SCOTT MORRISON
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Pepe v. Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04895
Plaintiff:
Roberto Pepe
Defendant:
Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Ted W. Love, Scott Morrison and others
Wang v. Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07157
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Ted W. Love, M.D., Scott Morrison and others
Justin Adkins v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 21-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN ADKINS, JUSTIN BLAKE, EDWIN GLOWACKI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, CRAIG S. HELIGMAN, M.D., GUS THOELE and others
Defendant:
CSX CORPORATION and DILLON DOUG JONES
Tammaro v. Audentes Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07288
Defendant:
Julie Anne Smith, Matthew R. Patterson, Jennifer Jarrett and others
Plaintiff:
Francesco Tammaro
Wang v. Audentes Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv08324
Defendant:
Julie Anne Smith, Matthew R. Patterson, Jennifer Jarrett and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Bushansky v. Audentes Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv08348
Defendant:
Julie Anne Smith, Matthew Patterson, Jennifer Jarrett and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
