Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv03624
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Raven Production Management Group, LLC v. Phantom Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02670
Plaintiff:
Raven Production Management Group, LLC
Defendant:
Phantom Labs, Inc., MATTHEW LUPTON and Sean P. Diddy Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-1234
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN "P. DIDDY" COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-1231
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN "P. DIDDY" COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 3:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Emrit v. Combs et al.
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv10566
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment, Atlantic Records and others
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-10605
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN P. DIDDY COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
