Cases 1 - 10 of 35
United States of America v. Lonich, et al.
as 23-1178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID JOHN LONICH, BRIAN SCOTT MELLAND and SEAN CLARK CUTTING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31909
Plaintiff:
SEAN CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2021cv00014
Defendant:
City of Hampton, Virginia
Plaintiff:
Sean Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 1:2020cv01436
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69329
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
