Other Civil Rights Cases
Simarjeet Kaur v. Baltimore County Police Department
as 23-1463
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIMARJEET KAUR
Defendant / Appellee: BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER POLLACK, OFFICER BIRKMAIER and others
Carl Reed, et al v. John Mackey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARL REED and CONSTANCE HALIBURTON-BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN P. MACKEY, In his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer, WHOLE FOODS MARKET-MIDWEST INC, doing business as SOUTHGATE TOWER MALL, WHOLE FOODS MARKETS and others
Charles v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
as 9:2015cv81435
Plaintiff: Jaurel Charles
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sanford v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2013cv22245
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Plaintiff: Terrance Sanford
Mediator: Cindy Niad Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAURIELLO v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01676
Plaintiff: ALBERT J. MAURIELLO
Defendant: SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KOTCHMAR v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2011cv04750
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER KOTCHMAR
Defendant: SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Emiru et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co et al
as 2:2009cv00380
Plaintiff: Lulsged Emiru and Fekerte Mengistu
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Co, Sears Roebuck and Co, Gary Lorentson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 2:2008cv00497
Plaintiff: Dennis C. Adams
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pandya v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc.
as 3:2007cv00259
Plaintiff: Varsha H. Pandya
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?