Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ELLIOTT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ELLIOTT, ANTWAIN JONES, ANTHONY STEWART and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Siddiqi v. Standard Truss & Roof Supply Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Kashif Siddiqi
Defendant:
Standard Truss & Roof Supply Inc. and Darrell Sebastian Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JUAREZ, D. SMITH, S. SMITH, MCCASTER, POINDEXTER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
ANTELMO JUAREZ, DOUGLAS SMITH, SEBASTIAN SMITH and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. POLSTON et al
as 1:2019cv00748
Defendant:
JACOBS, POLSTON, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
SEBASTIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Patton et al
as 5:2017cv00731
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Smith
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Hector Rios and Joe M Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McSwain et al
as 5:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Smith
Defendant:
Barbara McSwain and Joe Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Frech et al
as 5:2011cv01413
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Smith
Defendant:
Katryna Frech, Dr Troutt and Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Martin et al
as 6:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Smith
Defendant:
Terry Martin, Dianna Collins and Dick Bartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
