Cases 31 - 40 of 66
RATTLER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2011cv01565
Plaintiff:
CLYDE LACY RATTLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Bellm v. Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States
as 6:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Susan J. Bellm
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Young v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 4:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Mattie Young
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lombard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 2:2011cv10028
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Lombard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Maxquindom, Inc. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 2:2010cv07638
Plaintiff:
Maxquindom, Inc.
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Maxquindom, Inc. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 2:2010cv05268
Plaintiff:
Maxquindom, Inc.
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Morales v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 3:2010cv01315
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Maria Morales
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Randall Wolcott v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 10-10290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL D WOLCOTT, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States and TRAILBLAZER HEALTH ENTERPRISES LLC
Barron v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 1:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Randy E. Barron
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Copeland v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 6:2009cv02739
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Copeland
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
