Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
E. W., et al v. Detroit Public School District, et al
as 20-1790
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED and DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
E. W. and RONNITA BRYANT, Guardian of E.W.
Defendant / Appellant:
MYRON MONTGOMERY and BROADUS WILKINS
Larry Motley v. Securitas Security Serv, Inc.
as 19-1380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY L. MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Securitas Security Svc USA v. NLRB
as 16-60304
Petitioner:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Jamell Malone v. Securitas Security Services, et al
as 16-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMELL O. MALONE
Defendant - Appellee:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED and LOCAL 1 UNION SEIU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dianne Kampinen v. Securitas Security Services US, et al
as 15-1584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANNE KAMPINEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED, LATRICE COLEMAN, COREY BURAGE and others
Demetrius Staples, et al v. Paragon Systems, Incorporated, et al
as 14-3608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS STAPLES, BABATUNDE OWOSENI and ANDREW DILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, doing business as PARASYS, INC., SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INCORPORATED, doing business as SCG, SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED, doing business as SECURITAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
