Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Williams v. Heflin et al
as 3:2023cv00952
Plaintiff:
Eric A Williams
Defendant:
Tom Heflin, Scott Turney, Shane Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES et al
as 3:2022cv10892
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHANE JOHNSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, TERRY L RHODES, KIMBERLY SISKO WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65233
Plaintiff:
SHANE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2020cv00569
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE and VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
SHANE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01443
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06814
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75752
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ryeimer et al
as 4:2019cv04158
Defendant:
Shane Johnson, Debbie Reynolds-Crawford, Kristie Ryeimer and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00097
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gary Shane Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
