Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carl Davis, Jr. v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 17-2966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carl Davis, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Rory Griffin, Assistant Director Health Care Department, Amanda King, Ms., Infirmary Manager, ADC and others
Don Cook v. Travis Moore, et al
as 16-2194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Don Cook
Defendant - Appellee:
Travis Moore, Correctional Officer, Varner Unit, Randy Watson, Warden, Varner Unit, Lasaundra Malone, Major, Varner Max and others
Marlon Kellon, Jr. v. Jeremy Andrews, et al
as 16-2070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlon Dale Kellon, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit, ADC, Sharon Williams, Captain, Varner Unit, ADC, McConnel, Classification Administrator, Varner Unit, ADC and others
Davis et al v. Kelly et al
as 5:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Carl Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Rory Griffen, Amanda King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellon v. Andrews et al
as 5:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Marlon Dale Kellon , Jr
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrews, Sharon Williams, McConnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2015cv02087
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gene Evans
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Burl Cain, Barry Matheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Evans v. Rick Raemisch, et al
as 14-3527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE G. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, SHARON WILLIAMS, ROBERTA GAITHERS and others
Mucherson v. Williams
as 5:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mucherson
Defendant:
Sharon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharon Williams v. Jody Upton
as 14-10908
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHARON WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JODY R. UPTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
