Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shavers #378021 v. Crompton et al
as 1:2026cv02272
Plaintiff:
Michael Shavers #378021
Defendant:
Robert Crompton, Michael Burgess, Unknown Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Larche et al
as 3:2026cv01157
Plaintiff:
William James Ray and William Ray
Defendant:
Emma Larche, John Doe, J Shaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06006
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shavers #378021 v. Crompton et al
as 1:2026cv02153
Plaintiff:
Michael Shavers #378021
Defendant:
Robert Crompton, Michael Burgess, Unknown Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shavers v. Crompton et al
as 2:2026cv12513
Plaintiff:
Michael Shavers
Defendant:
Robert Crompton, M. Burgess, Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Shavers v. Crompton et al
as 2:2026cv12512
Plaintiff:
Michael Shavers
Defendant:
Robert Crompton, Michael Burgess, Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gordon et al v. Maglinger et al
as 4:2026cv00468
Plaintiff:
John Gordon and Julia Gordon
Defendant:
Art Maglinger, James Barkman, Skylar Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Shaver v. English et al
as 3:2026cv01019
Plaintiff:
Rodney Shaver, II
Defendant:
English, Shrek, Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAVER v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2026cv04631
Plaintiff:
NADINE SHAVER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
