Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Shumpert v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv06026
Plaintiff:
Everett Drayden Shumpert
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shumpert v. The County of Cook
as 1:2011cv06435
Plaintiff:
Everett Drayden Shumpert
Defendant:
The County of Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shumpert v. Robinson, et al
as 1:2011cv02412
Plaintiff:
Farley Shumpert
Defendant:
T. Robinson , M. Landon and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shumpert et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv04425
Plaintiff:
Everett Drayden Shumpert and Hebrew Methodological Institute
Defendant:
The United States of America, Barack Obama, Richard Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Minks et al v. Shumpert et al
as 1:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Minks and Angie Lynn Minks
Defendant:
Javan Shumpert, Kelly Whitfield and City of Aberdeen, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shumpert et al v. J&H Restaurant, et al
as 5:2008cv00172
Plaintiff:
Sheila Shumpert, Lavance Davenport and Ricky Davenport
Defendant:
J&H Restaurant and Chris Droge
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shumpert v. VA Medical Center
as 3:2008cv00893
Petitioner:
Edward C. Shumpert
Respondent:
VA Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawkins v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv06198
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hawkins and Ricky Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, J Perez, M. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
