Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Shu v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Love Shu
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Darrell Williams v. United States
as 20-3175
Defendant:
T. Dickens, Lieutenant, Michael D. Smith, Warden, Jeff E. Krueger, North Central Region FBOP Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Henry Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Darrell Williams v. United States
as 20-2946
Defendant:
Michael D. Smith, Warden, John Doe 2, HUM2 CO, Jane Doe, HUM2 CO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Henry Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Hodson v. United States of America et al
as 0:2020cv01527
Defendant:
Unknown Guard, Unknown SHU Leutenant and United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Hodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dollar et al v. Kirin Garden Lins LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00730
Defendant:
Xiang Xu Lin, Jin Shu Lin and Kirin Garden Lins LLC
Plaintiff:
Jaylon Dollar and Stephanie Dollar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raphael Mendez v. FMC Minnesota, et al
as 17-2438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
FMC Minnesota, Lt. Holbus, (SHU), Officer Kepp and others
Anthony Payton v. T. C. Outlaw, et al
as 15-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony L. Payton
Defendant - Appellee:
T. C. Outlaw, Former Warden, FCI - Forrest City, N. Thompson, SIS, FCI - Forrest City, Haulk, Officer, FCI - Forrest City and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv03273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Payton v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Payton
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, N Thompson, Haulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
