Cases 31 - 40 of 374
Simon v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Yitzchak Simon
Defendant:
Tishaura Oneda Jones, Yusef Scoggin and Advantes Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Simon Chuar
as 23-2272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Simon Tongyik Chuar
Tony Jackson v. Steve Simon, et al
as 23-1832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony D. Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Simon, State of Minnesota Secretary of State and Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Yancey et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Joseph Yancey and Simone Gully
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bradley v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dana Ruby Bradley
Defendant:
Wes Allen, Nancy Dahlstrom, Adrian Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Knights of Columbus v. Simon et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Defendant:
Diana Simon, Justin Freihaut and Daniel Freihaut
Plaintiff:
Knights of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ind.-Alliance Party of Minn., et al v. Steve Simon
as 23-1074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Independence-Alliance Party of Minnesota and Hugh McTavish
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as the Minnesota secretary of state, or his successor
Simon Quito-Guachichulca v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1069
Petitioner:
Simon Gavino Quito-Guachichulca
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
