Cases 31 - 40 of 299
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tedder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02220
Plaintiff:
William Tedder, Maureen Cobb, Richard Tyler and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
US v. Ibrahim Oudeh
as 23-1539
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant / Appellant:
DR. IBRAHIM OUDEH, TERESA SLOAN-OUDEH and IBRAHIM OUDEH, M.D., P.A.
Sloan v. USA
as 7:2023cv00986
Petitioner:
Herbert Anthony Sloan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sloan v. R. S. Dunbar, Warden
as 9:2023cv01782
Petitioner:
Dameion Sloan
Respondent:
R. S. Dunbar, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
US v. Claude Sloan
as 23-6369
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLAUDE SLOAN
Neal v. Sloan
as 8:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Corryn Neal
Defendant:
Steven Michael Lee Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Allen Sloan Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01544
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Sloan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Andrew Fields, III v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-6246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN STREEVAL, A. W. GOLDEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
