Cases 1 - 10 of 28
SLOAN v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
DENNIS A. SLOAN
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JAIL COMMANDER, A. FENI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT SLOAN
Defendant:
SHERIFF DWAYNE BURGESS, MAJOR REINHART, LT. C. KAKAVECOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, TRACY BERRY, LAURA KLOIMWEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLOAN v. BURGESS
as 1:2022cv00406
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SLOAN
Respondent:
BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLOAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06736
Plaintiff:
YOLANDO SLOAN and YOLANDO M. SLOAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLOAN v. OKAFOR et al
as 1:2021cv02976
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY SLOAN
Defendant:
CHRISTABEL OKAFOR, WESTWAYS STAFFING SERVICE, IDOC PLAINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAX et al v. SLOAN et al
as 1:2021cv00202
Defendant:
NATHAN SLOAN, MELISSA PEASE, DENNIS MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE S. LAX and CRYSTAL LAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. MUNCIE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv02044
Defendant:
NATHAN SLOAN, MUNCIE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIELLE BRADFORD and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv03781
Defendant:
TRACY BERRY, GWENDOLYN HORTH, DAVID SLOAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
