Cases 1 - 10 of 796
Jomo Barnett v. Joseph Schember, et al
as 24-1801
Plaintiff:
JOMO BARNETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH SCHEMBER, Mayor, DAN SPIZABNEY, Chief of Police, ELIZABETH A. HIRZ, Head of D.A. Office and others
MCMENAMIN v. SPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv05538
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCMENAMIN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SPIRO, SERGEANT SLOAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
DENNIS A. SLOAN
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JAIL COMMANDER, A. FENI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloane v. Rowland et al
as 6:2024cv06103
Plaintiff:
Derek Sloane
Defendant:
C.O. W. M. Rowland, E. Mathews, C.O. A. Altta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick McIntosh v. Unknown Charleston County Sheriff's Deputies, et al
as 24-10408
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RANDALL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, UNKNOWN CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE OFFICERS ET.AL, SHERRI A. BROWN and others
BRYANT JR. v. SGT. EL SLOAN et al
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. BRYANT JR.
Defendant:
SGT. EL SLOAN and OFC. JEFFERIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Niece, Lt. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rueda v. Salem Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Ivan Cortes Rueda
Defendant:
Salem Hospital, Andrew J. Cleary, Corby W. Makin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon Polk v. Lopez-Rivera, et al
as 23-14059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON S. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
LOPEZ-RIVERA, V. MYERS, J SLOAN and others
Sloan v. Medical Staff
as 6:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Claude Gene Sloan
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
