Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Clarke v. Gladziszewski et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Maria Gladziszewski, Carole Triem, Barbra Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Smith
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Smith
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clarke v. Smith
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Sandra Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Helzer et al
as 3:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Doug Smith, Robert Griffin, Allen Vezey and others
Defendant:
Anne Helzer, Van Lawrence, Richard Stillie, Jr and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Alaskans for Better Elections, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Hoss et al
as 4:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Stanley E. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence Hoss, State of Alaska, Christopher Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bennett et al v. Weldon et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Heather Bennett, James Barrett, Amy Breaux and others
Defendant:
Beth Weldon, Michelle Bonnet Hale, Wade Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eady v. Franciosi et al
as 3:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tierre Fady and Tierre Eady
Defendant:
Michael Franciosi, Thomas Mathews, Jeffrey Bell and others
Eclips v. Siegrist et al
as 3:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Luna Eclips
Defendant:
Mykel Siegrist, John Darnall, APD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
