Cases 21 - 30 of 2,372
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Scruggs v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Nicole Bridegroom, Titianna Moody, Jason English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. GEO AND ITS GUARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HARVEY
Defendant:
GEO AND ITS GUARDS, MURPHY, MIKE SCHIDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Nolen et al
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Nolen, Jones, Crittendon and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Mysti Valencia
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Jason Nowatzke, Christopher Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Baker v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
G. Smith, P. Lake, Swagger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUGGLE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
BRYAN TUGGLE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and OBADIAH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
English, Aaron Smith, Mallot and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
