Cases 21 - 30 of 57
BECK v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2017cv02488
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALVIN BECK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION and DAVID SKORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beck v. United States Government et al
as 3:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
John Alvin Beck
Defendant:
United States Government, Smithsonian Institution and David Skorton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M. Gibbs-Squires v. William Cosby, Jr., et al
as 17-1770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS-SQUIRES, Esq.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR., SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BOARD OF REGENTS, SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Amos v. Smithsonian Institution
as 1:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
Carl Raymond Amos
Defendant:
Smithsonian Institution
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOHNSON v. D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2016cv01721
Plaintiff:
WILBUR JOHNSON
Defendant:
D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY and SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE ARCHIVES MUSEUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF MARY W. REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
as 1:2016cv00960
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF MARY W. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GIBBS-SQUIRES v. COSBY et al
as 2:2016cv00768
Plaintiff:
M. EUGENE GIBBS-SQUIRES
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY (BILL) COSBY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
