Cases 1 - 10 of 463
Comerica Bank v. 5515 Spalding, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
5515 Spalding, LLC, Anil Damani, 2457 Martin Luther, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Appointment of Receiver
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, et al
as 24-6081
Petitioner:
DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS, WARDEN GOLDEY, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Burnette v. Griffin-Spalding County School District et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Burnette
Defendant:
Griffin-Spalding County School District, Dr. Keith Simmons, R. Syntel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
NEA BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00419
Not Yet Classified:
NEA BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CRITTENDEN, BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL UNION COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, COREWELL HEALTH GROSSE POINTE HOSPITAL, COREWELL HEALTH WILLIAM BEAUMONT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Spalding v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00337
Petitioner:
David L Spalding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
