Cases 1 - 10 of 17
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC v. KIRK et al
as 2:2025cv00629
Plaintiff:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant:
JODI L KIRK and SPENCER MARTIN
Interested Party:
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Martin v. Forward Solutions, LLC
as 1:2025cv02858
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin, Jamie Arenburg, James Pierrilus and others
Defendant:
Forward Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Spencer Martin v. Matthew Blair, et al
as 24-2408
Plaintiff:
SPENCER MARTIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH DETHROW and MATTHEW BLAIR
Spencer Martin v. Matthew Blair, et al
as 24-2384
Defendant:
JOSEPH DETHROW and MATTHEW BLAIR
Plaintiff:
SPENCER MARTIN
CARRION v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03836
Plaintiff:
SPENCER MARTIN CARRION
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Holt County, Missouri et al
as 5:2022cv06079
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Defendant:
Holt County, Missouri, City of Mound City, Missouri, Chief of Police John Panning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Youngman et al
as 3:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Defendant:
C/O Youngman, C/O Montroy, C/O Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12272
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SPENCER MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Blair et al
as 1:2019cv05807
Defendant:
Demetria Johnson, E Johnson, Deathrow and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2019cv00503
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiqui, Nurse Practitioner Zimmerman, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
