Cases 41 - 50 of 197
Eakins v. Carrier IQ et al
as 2:2012cv02053
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Eakins
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Siegel v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv08791
Plaintiff:
Michael Siegel
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc., Sprint-Nextel Corporation, Samsung Electronics America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kacmarcik v. Carrier IQ Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01119
Plaintiff:
Andy Kacmarcik
Defendant:
Carrier IQ Inc, Sprint Nextel Corporation, HTC Corporation and others
Pacilli et al v. Carrier IQ Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01199
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pacilli , Saima Mian , Amandeep Singh and others
Defendant:
Carrier IQ Inc., AT & T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Sandra Palmer, et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 11-35991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SANDRA L PALMER
Objector - Appellant:
RICARDO H NIGAGLIONI
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, a Kansas corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv14934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
LINE SYSTEMS, INC. v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv06527
Plaintiff:
LINE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01600
Plaintiff:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. , AT&T MOBILITY LLC , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 5:2011mc09002
Petitioner:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Respondent:
Jack R.T. Jordan and Maria Jordan
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. Sprint Nextel Cell Phone No. 619-758-8239
as 3:2011mc01013
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Cell Phone No. 619-758-8239
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
