Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Spurlock v. Lumpkin
as 23-20062
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daphne Octavia Spurlock
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Spurlock v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Daphne Octavia Spurlock
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01049
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
Douglas County Jail, Douglas County, Tony Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Terry James Buchanon, II
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles, Lynn Head, Sarah C. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Culver v. Valenza et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2020cv00769
Plaintiff:
Victor Jandell Culver
Defendant:
Austin Arnold, Greg Lee, Angelica Black and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chiarizio v. Murrill et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Karla Walker Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Angelique D. Spurlock v. People of the State of California
as 2:2019cv07787
Petitioner:
Angelique D. Spurlock and Angelique D Spurlock
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ovesian v. Spurlock
as 1:2019cv01032
Petitioner:
Jensen Cash Ovesian
Respondent:
Tony Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Ovesian v. Spurlock
as 1:2018cv03294
Petitioner:
Jensen Cash Ovesian
Respondent:
Tony Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2018cv03353
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, FNU Scott, FNU Spurlock and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
