Cases 31 - 40 of 70
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 21-30505
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Michael Nedd, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
State of Texas v. Biden
as 21-10806
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Law School Clinics, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
State of Louisiana et al v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv01074
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Kei Koizumi, Brenda Mallory and others
Plaintiff:
State of Florida, State of Alabama, State of South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Louisiana et al v Biden et al
as 2:2021cv00778
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Jon Raby, Karen Mouritsen and others
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cook Inletkeeper, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas et al v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
United States Of America, Jennifer Granholm, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Energy, Scott De La Vega, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ward v. State of Texas
as 4:2020cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Ward
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Missouri, State of New Mexico and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rondale R. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Gregg Abbott, et al
as 20-50264
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Respondent:
SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S SURGERY CENTER, WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S. and others
Petitioner:
KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing, PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, In re: GREGG ABBOTT, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas and others
Hewitt v. Helix Engy Solutions Grp
as 19-20023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. HEWITT
Defendant / Appellee:
HELIX WELL OPS, INCORPORATED and HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
Independent Petroleum Association of America, State of Mississippi, Offshore Operators Committee and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00068
Defendant:
United States of America , Kirstjen M. Nielsen , Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Karla Perez , Maria Rocha , Jose Magana-Salgado and others
Movant:
State of New Jersey
Amicu:
U.S. Rep. Steve King, et al.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
