Cases 71 - 80 of 4,008
May v. Talladega County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Talladega County Jail, State of Alabama, Julie Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Mays et al
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mays
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Herman Harris, Kenneth Parham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stacey Ballard and Stacey Ballard
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Utah v. Su
as 23-11097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
King v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Edward Lavar King
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Patrick Charest
as 23-13545
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICK J. CHAREST
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
West v. State of Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne West
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Kobie Gene Kavich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Holloway v. Chambers County Sheriff, et al
as 23-13484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JEROME HOLLOWAY
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAMBERS COUNTY SHERIFF and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
William Watson v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 23-13460
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and LIMESTONE CF WARDEN
Carmichael v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv01393
Petitioner:
LaForest Carmichael
Respondent:
Reosha Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
