Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 23-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INCORPORATED, ENGAGE ARMAMENT LLC, ANDREW RAYMOND and others
Defendant / Appellee: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1824
Plaintiff / Appellee: HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Defendant / Appellant: STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office, ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity of Secretary, United States Department of of Health and Human Services, and his employees, agents and successors in office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1784
Appellant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Davetta Range v. Dana Van Metre We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1345
Defendant / Appellee: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BRIAN A. JACKSON, SA RACHEL ROLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVETTA LYNN RANGE
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Tyrone Hurt v. State of Mississippi
as 15-2436
Plaintiff - Appellant: TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and ALL STATES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 09-1623
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Intervenor: STATE OF ALABAMA
Amicus Curiae: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1623
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellant: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Intervenor: STATE OF ALABAMA
Amicus Supporting Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
Amicus Supporting Appellee: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROFESSORS, AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY and others
James Morris v. Warden Joyce Francis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6960
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES ALLEN MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN JOYCE FRANCIS, The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?