Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant: Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver: Thomas W. McNamara
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Amazon.com Inc Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01495
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc
Intervenor: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of Wisconsin v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff: State of Wisconsin
Defendant: 3M Company, E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company, DuPont de Nemours Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 tc
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court: In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Safeguard Metals LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00691
Defendant: Jeffrey Santulan, Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Hill
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission and others
Petitioner: Utah Division of Securities
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff: Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant: HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
In re: American Rivers, et al v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 21-16961
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Defendant: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?