Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
LARREW v. MOONEYHAM
as 1:2011cv01346
Plaintiff: STEPHEN JAMES LARREW
Defendant: JAMES D. MOONEYHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stephen Wong v. Mark Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35574
Petitioner - Appellant: STEPHEN JAMES WONG
Respondent - Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Wong v. Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00473
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Petitioner: Stephen James Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. USA
as 2:2009cv70127
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Stephen James Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Latvis v. Hopkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00350
Plaintiff: Stephen James Latvis
Defendant: Hopkins and Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Riches v. John Melendrez
as 08-7802
Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN MANUEL MELENDREZ, CHRISTOPHER ERIC MCNEIL, STEPHEN JAMES STAPLETON and others
Riches v. Stapleton
as 6:2008cv00633
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant: Stephen James Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Cassell v. Santos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv06176
Petitioner: Stephen James Cassell
Respondent: Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Engleman v. Deputy Murray, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2060
Plaintiff - Appellee: Stephen James Engleman
Defendant - Appellant: Deputy Murray
Defendant: Chief of Police Keith Smith, Gentry Police Department

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?