Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Andrew Joseph, Jr. v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 23-10739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HENRY ECHENIQUE, MARK CLARK and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Carter v. Hoskins et al
as 4:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Defendant:
Chuck Hoskins, Jr, Bryan Warner, Sam Hider Health Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Stitt, et al
as 22-6094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
J. KEVIN STITT and PAUL ZIRIAX
Jones v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt and Paul Ziriax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lowes Home Improvement Corp
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Defendant:
Lowes Home Improvement Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OLEXSAK et al v. JONES et al
as 2:2021cv20026
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PETER OLEXSAK and JENNIFER LYNN OLEXSAK
Defendant:
CAPTAIN STEPHEN JONES, BOONTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and TOWN OF BOONTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv03305
Defendant:
Vincent Ferrante, John Does, The City Of New York, and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard Roes
Plaintiff:
Jeku Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loftin v. The City of Prentiss, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00062
Plaintiff:
Joshua Loftin
Defendant:
The City of Prentiss, Mississippi, Joseph Bullock and Officer Stephen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Aaron's, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01073
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Defendant:
Aaron's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
